On social media, he emphasized that the imperialist decision was made under the fallacy of a supposed threat to national security and consists of threatening countries that export fuel to Cuba with punitive tariffs.

“It amounts to limiting, with absurd pretexts, the sovereign prerogative of each country when determining whether and to what destination it exports its national heritage products,” he wrote.

He also posed key questions such as: Who can guarantee the limits of this power that the United States, with its aggression against Cuba, now claims for itself?

He further stressed that what is currently based on an energy war could become punishment for exports of any other good from any market that competes with the US market.

abo/arm/mem/bbb